Issue 115 – Essentialism!

I often use the term “inherent value” and concentrate on how to get more worth for clients’ real estate sales investments. As a real estate broker, I am also always concerned with offering value to clients. This worthwhile objective got me to thinking about my own philosophy about the topic. 

Enter: Essentialism. By definition it is “the belief that certain things have a set of necessary attributes that make them what they are or a lifestyle practice of focusing on what is essential and eliminating the non-essential to reclaim control over one’s choices,” as popularized by Greg McKeown’s book, Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less.

So, what does “essential” mean in the context of real estate sales? I believe it is a professional mindset of focused and disciplined pursuit of fewer, more impactful activities. This is where experience comes into play. Having a distinct unique strategy for each and every transaction, is key. 

As explained by author/consultant Wendy Forsythe, the principle of focused strategy, or strategic restraint, “applies to both business strategy, where real estate brokers prioritize and limit new tools or initiatives, and to the broker-client relationship, emphasizing key areas like client advocacy, trust-building, and ethical conduct to achieve better outcomes and more meaningful success.”

For me, this translates to a commitment to quality over quantity when assisting clients in selling and buying properties. I believe in delivering the best. As a veteran agent, I focus on only those things that will bring value to my clients: connecting with potential buyers and sellers, as there are no shortcuts to building relationships in real estate.

My approach is strategic in all aspects, especially when it comes to implementing sales and marketing tools. I carefully evaluate and adopt new technology and marketing systems, always keeping my clients’ objectives straightforward and maintaining focus to prevent wasted effort. 

Essentialism in client relationships means I consistently focus on actions that maximize benefit for my buyers and sellers. This includes building trust, providing excellent customer service, and acting with integrity. 

One of the biggest challenges is dispelling the myth that all real estate advisors are interchangeable. Commoditizing brokers is to be avoided at all costs. 

In a New York Times article earlier this year about the changing commission structures, industry folks discussed the market’s perception of brokers. Commoditization of real estate brokers means that the market’s perception of us as interchangeable and indistinguishable, like basic commodities, leading to competition primarily based on price rather than unique value. 

To combat this false narrative, a broker must have a strong personal brand, offering unique, value-driven services. 

In addition, not only is it crucial for me to have my own strong brand, but I must also provide added value working with an established brokerage, which, in turn, creates credibility and a high level of trustworthiness along with advisory components across the board. Our large, established network has a reputation for professionalism and reliability and owners of high-end homes get far market reach along with the prestige of a well-known brand. 

Having access to in-depth market research and analytics allows competition with even bigger rocket houses, given the relatively new AI component of being able to provide a detailed analysis in mere minutes — instant gratification! 

Ultimately, leveraging your distinctive qualities through marketing is a highly effective strategy for captivating an audience — demonstrating rather than merely describing your offerings —further amplified by a brokerage capable of reaching a broader market.

Issue 125 – The $5 Million Question: What’s Actually Worth Owning in New York Right Now?

The New York real estate market is entering a period where the old rules of valuation are becoming less reliable. Price per square foot and comparable sales still matter, but buyers are weighing those factors differently — rewarding some attributes while quietly discounting others. The question is no longer simply, “What did the apartment downstairs sell for?” It’s “What are buyers willing to pay a premium for now — and what have they stopped paying for?”

I could identify at least seven factors being repriced in Manhattan right now: outdoor space, views/greenery, turnkey condition, monthly carrying costs, new development versus resale, second-home ownership, and the increasingly important distinction between a great apartment and a great building.

Confusing matters for buyers is that the NYC market is sending contradictory signals. Manhattan inventory is changing by price band, mortgage rates remain challenging nationally, and NYC’s new pied-à-terre tax is creating another potential dividing line in how buyers assess ownership costs.  

In the luxury zone, one way to test those shifting valuations is what I call “The $5-Million-Question.”

I can take $5 million and show clients what that buys today in six completely different versions of New York: Think:

  • $5M on Central Park West
  • $5M downtown
  • $5M in Brooklyn
  • $5M in a new development
  • $5M in a great prewar co-op
  • $5M for something compromised but spectacular

Same amount of money. Same city. Radically different value.

The questions to ponder are:

  • Which one would I buy?
  • Which one would I avoid?
  • Which one has the greatest upside?
  • And which one will be easiest to sell five years from now?

That comparison is more revealing than a market-wide statistic because it shows what the same $5 million actually buys — and what it might be worth to the next buyer.

On the surface, the questions are simple. In practice, answering them requires a sophisticated analysis — price per square foot, carrying costs, taxes, liquidity, buyer pool, neighborhood trajectory, architectural quality, and exit strategy. Buyers should seek out an expert broker not only for information but also for interpretation.

For a long time, value was assessed through familiar metrics: price per square foot, comparable sales, neighborhood, floor, light, views, condition, and building pedigree. Those factors still matter. But buyers are now weighing them differently. We are in a repricing phase — not necessarily of New York City as a whole, but of the individual components that define its value.

At Central Park West, $5 million typically trades square footage for permanence: park frontage, architectural significance, scarcity, and long-term stability.

Downtown, the same budget may secure a more contemporary product — larger windows, amenities, and outdoor space — but often at a higher price per square foot and with higher ongoing costs.

In a new development, $5 million buys condition, services, and immediacy. The question is how much of that price reflects a “new development premium,” and whether the resale market will recognize it when the time comes to exit.

In Brooklyn, the same capital can deliver scale, outdoor space, and architectural character that would be significantly more expensive in Manhattan.

None of these is inherently superior. The real questions are: What are you actually buying, and who will want it next? That second part is often underweighted: Which market is offering more rewards?

Based on buyer behavior, several attributes are becoming more defensible:

Light and views are not replicable. While layouts can be changed, exposure and outlook cannot be transformed.

Functional outdoor space is valuable. Usable terraces connected to living areas are materially more valuable than secondary or awkwardly accessed outdoor areas.

Strong floor plans are key. The pandemic reinforced that usability matters as much as size. Proportion, flow, and flexibility are now critical.

Condition has always mattered — now more than ever. High construction costs and uncertainty have increased demand for finished product. However, there is a ceiling — buyers will not indefinitely overpay for someone else’s design choices.

Low carrying friction is persuasive. Taxes, common charges, assessments, and long-term building health are now central to valuation. High monthly costs can materially impact resale liquidity.

Scarcity can be the tipping point. A strong apartment does not need to be perfect. It needs to be difficult to replicate.

So, where would I be most cautious today?

I would be disciplined about paying a premium purely for newness. New does not hold value on its own — architecture, location, and scarcity do. I would closely evaluate buildings where carrying costs are disconnected from underlying asset value. I would avoid trophy pricing unless there is a true trophy attribute. And I would be careful about pricing that is anchored primarily to renovation cost.

A $2 million renovation does not translate into a $2 million increase in value.

The market does not reimburse cost. It prices outcome.

If I were allocating funds at this level, the guiding principles should be: light over finishes, proportion over decoration, irreplaceable views over amenity packages, and ultimately, best-in-class units in proven buildings over average units in trending ones.

The strongest purchases do two things at once: they function as exceptional homes today and remain desirable assets tomorrow. That means thinking about the exit before the entry — and recognizing that New York isn’t one market, but a collection of micro-markets defined by neighborhood, block, building, floor, and orientation.

While real estate is inherently emotional, value is what remains when emotion fades.

Whether the budget is $1 million, $5 million, or $25 million, the question is ultimately the same: What is actually worth owning?

That is the question the next phase of the market will answer — and it will reward analysis over generalization.

Recent Reports

SUBSCRIBE TO THE KATZEN REPORT

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE PULSE ON REAL ESTATE