Issue 104 – 2024: A Year of Reflection and Laying the Groundwork for the Unleashing of 2025

To describe 2024 as a challenging year would be an understatement. It posed significant trials, not only in the real estate market but also in the realms of leadership, geopolitics, social justice, and governmental shifts. When you condense all these factors and throw them into a fast-paced environment, it feels akin to being shot out of a cannon and landing in unfamiliar territory. This whirlwind experience has compelled everyone to innovate, seize new opportunities, and embrace change, ultimately creating value in various dimensions — not just real estate.

After nearly two decades of impressive leadership at my firm, the time has come for a new generation to emerge, rejuvenating and recalibrating our approach. This transition is not about retreating to the sidelines; it’s about returning stronger and more proactive, making tough decisions, and communicating transparently. This is the essence of leadership — effecting successful change and solidifying our position as the leading brokerage in the country.

Being progressive does not equate to being “woke.” It signifies a strategic approach rooted in analytics, technology, and engineering, a more efficient business model that yields returns for brokers and investors alike. To achieve this, it is vital to understand people’s needs, fostering an environment that retains top talent while navigating a Federal Reserve that acknowledges the necessity for affordable housing solutions.

Policies that incentivize maximum returns on illiquid assets are essential, especially when economic conditions seem tight due to inflation and job market fluctuations. Although firms like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup have reported better-than-expected earnings, this does not automatically translate into benefits for the real estate sector. We inhabit a world that craves instant gratification and demands the utmost value for earned dollars — a world that calls for change on local, global, and environmental fronts.

Reflecting on the events of 2024, I am more convinced than ever of our responsibility to ensure that our legacy enables future generations to dream bigger and recognize that their voices can and do effect change. As I stand on this platform, discussing real estate, I see it as an opportunity to advocate for a more holistic transformation. The real estate sector continues to astonish me with its ongoing performance.

As we approach the end of the year, the past few weeks have been among the most fruitful in terms of transactions I have witnessed all year. Why is this the case? I suspect that people are beginning to realize that market dynamics will shift in the new year, with interest rates likely to decrease along with fluctuating sale prices and inventory. It seems prudent to capitalize on opportunities now, even if it means accepting slightly higher rates with plans for refinancing as rates adjust downward, in line with Powell’s predictions for 2025.

The 50-basis-point adjustment in early October reignited our sales market, leading to reductions in asking prices. This makes participation almost irresistible, particularly when it includes refinancing intentions. The Federal Reserve anticipates four additional rate cuts over the next year, each by 25 basis points. If this occurs, I believe people will feel comfortable acquiring property and financing it at higher rates with plans to refinance later.

I find myself invigorated by change these days. While I have not always welcomed it, I am immensely proud of the changemakers who have dared to step forward when many prefer to stay in their comfort zones. Real estate is a unique mechanism where fear and hope coexist within the same bricks and mortar.

Throughout this past year, we have witnessed significant changes in the real estate landscape, from National Association of Realtors (NAR) adjustments in commissions to shifts in rental laws. Yet, the ultimate response to these developments has been that sellers and brokers maintain the status quo, which has played out consistently. We recognize that imposing restrictions only reinforces the truth that people do not have to comply. We have seen interest rates soar to 8%, but they are now returning from those peaks, and we anticipate further reductions. While fluctuations may occur, the overall sales market has undergone considerable capitulation, presenting fantastic opportunities for prospective buyers.

I want to express my gratitude to all those who have courageously stepped forward and allowed me to partner with them in the buying or selling process, even when the climate was less than favorable. Together, we will witness the results and returns that follow.

This past year has been a year of profound learning — a time for all of us to reflect on who we are and how we choose to navigate this new world. I wish you a meaningful, joyful, and loving end to the year, and may 2025 bring forth all that was previously lacking.

Issue 125 – The $5 Million Question: What’s Actually Worth Owning in New York Right Now?

The New York real estate market is entering a period where the old rules of valuation are becoming less reliable. Price per square foot and comparable sales still matter, but buyers are weighing those factors differently — rewarding some attributes while quietly discounting others. The question is no longer simply, “What did the apartment downstairs sell for?” It’s “What are buyers willing to pay a premium for now — and what have they stopped paying for?”

I could identify at least seven factors being repriced in Manhattan right now: outdoor space, views/greenery, turnkey condition, monthly carrying costs, new development versus resale, second-home ownership, and the increasingly important distinction between a great apartment and a great building.

Confusing matters for buyers is that the NYC market is sending contradictory signals. Manhattan inventory is changing by price band, mortgage rates remain challenging nationally, and NYC’s new pied-à-terre tax is creating another potential dividing line in how buyers assess ownership costs.  

In the luxury zone, one way to test those shifting valuations is what I call “The $5-Million-Question.”

I can take $5 million and show clients what that buys today in six completely different versions of New York: Think:

  • $5M on Central Park West
  • $5M downtown
  • $5M in Brooklyn
  • $5M in a new development
  • $5M in a great prewar co-op
  • $5M for something compromised but spectacular

Same amount of money. Same city. Radically different value.

The questions to ponder are:

  • Which one would I buy?
  • Which one would I avoid?
  • Which one has the greatest upside?
  • And which one will be easiest to sell five years from now?

That comparison is more revealing than a market-wide statistic because it shows what the same $5 million actually buys — and what it might be worth to the next buyer.

On the surface, the questions are simple. In practice, answering them requires a sophisticated analysis — price per square foot, carrying costs, taxes, liquidity, buyer pool, neighborhood trajectory, architectural quality, and exit strategy. Buyers should seek out an expert broker not only for information but also for interpretation.

For a long time, value was assessed through familiar metrics: price per square foot, comparable sales, neighborhood, floor, light, views, condition, and building pedigree. Those factors still matter. But buyers are now weighing them differently. We are in a repricing phase — not necessarily of New York City as a whole, but of the individual components that define its value.

At Central Park West, $5 million typically trades square footage for permanence: park frontage, architectural significance, scarcity, and long-term stability.

Downtown, the same budget may secure a more contemporary product — larger windows, amenities, and outdoor space — but often at a higher price per square foot and with higher ongoing costs.

In a new development, $5 million buys condition, services, and immediacy. The question is how much of that price reflects a “new development premium,” and whether the resale market will recognize it when the time comes to exit.

In Brooklyn, the same capital can deliver scale, outdoor space, and architectural character that would be significantly more expensive in Manhattan.

None of these is inherently superior. The real questions are: What are you actually buying, and who will want it next? That second part is often underweighted: Which market is offering more rewards?

Based on buyer behavior, several attributes are becoming more defensible:

Light and views are not replicable. While layouts can be changed, exposure and outlook cannot be transformed.

Functional outdoor space is valuable. Usable terraces connected to living areas are materially more valuable than secondary or awkwardly accessed outdoor areas.

Strong floor plans are key. The pandemic reinforced that usability matters as much as size. Proportion, flow, and flexibility are now critical.

Condition has always mattered — now more than ever. High construction costs and uncertainty have increased demand for finished product. However, there is a ceiling — buyers will not indefinitely overpay for someone else’s design choices.

Low carrying friction is persuasive. Taxes, common charges, assessments, and long-term building health are now central to valuation. High monthly costs can materially impact resale liquidity.

Scarcity can be the tipping point. A strong apartment does not need to be perfect. It needs to be difficult to replicate.

So, where would I be most cautious today?

I would be disciplined about paying a premium purely for newness. New does not hold value on its own — architecture, location, and scarcity do. I would closely evaluate buildings where carrying costs are disconnected from underlying asset value. I would avoid trophy pricing unless there is a true trophy attribute. And I would be careful about pricing that is anchored primarily to renovation cost.

A $2 million renovation does not translate into a $2 million increase in value.

The market does not reimburse cost. It prices outcome.

If I were allocating funds at this level, the guiding principles should be: light over finishes, proportion over decoration, irreplaceable views over amenity packages, and ultimately, best-in-class units in proven buildings over average units in trending ones.

The strongest purchases do two things at once: they function as exceptional homes today and remain desirable assets tomorrow. That means thinking about the exit before the entry — and recognizing that New York isn’t one market, but a collection of micro-markets defined by neighborhood, block, building, floor, and orientation.

While real estate is inherently emotional, value is what remains when emotion fades.

Whether the budget is $1 million, $5 million, or $25 million, the question is ultimately the same: What is actually worth owning?

That is the question the next phase of the market will answer — and it will reward analysis over generalization.

Recent Reports

SUBSCRIBE TO THE KATZEN REPORT

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE PULSE ON REAL ESTATE