Issue 101 – Election Madness: Navigating the Real Estate Ripple Effect

Election years always bring a degree of chaos, and the impact on the real estate market is no exception. As we approach Election Day, the effect on housing and mortgage rates is becoming evident. This phenomenon stems from three main factors: uncertainty, policy expectations, and consumer confidence.

Uncertainty about election outcomes can cause buyers and sellers to either delay or rush decisions. Policy expectations related to housing regulations, taxes, and subsidies also influence market behavior. Lastly, consumer confidence impacts the market, as people may postpone major purchases until they feel more secure about the country’s direction.

Both candidates are focused on housing. Initially, Trump and Biden proposed policies that could significantly affect the real estate market. Kamala Harris, now the official Democratic Party candidate, recently announced a proposed $25,000 subsidy for first-time homebuyers and a commitment to creating three million new homes.

According to a recent article in The Real Deal, Harris posted her vision on X: “Every American deserves affordable housing — yet the cost is too high in communities across our nation. That is why our Administration just took another step to lower costs by announcing actions to limit rent increases and build more affordable homes.”

Democrats generally support measures like rent caps and increased housing construction, which have met resistance from landlord groups.

Trump, who is familiar with the industry, aims to extend policies from his 2017 tax law, which expires in 2025, and provide additional tax incentives to promote homeownership. Trump wants to increase the standard deduction while the SALT (State and Local Tax) deduction.  Currently, SALT allows taxpayers who itemize to deduct up to $10,000 of property, sales, or income taxes already paid to state and local governments; initially, the SALT deduction was unlimited. In theory, the deduction exists to offset some federal taxpayer liability by excluding income already taken in taxes for state and local government services. The $10,000 SALT cap hit high-cost, high-tax blue states such as New York and New Jersey the hardest — a key concern for those in New York City.

Historically, President Biden planned to reverse parts of this law and increase corporate taxes. Should she win the election, Harris is expected to follow suit.

Referencing the same article by TRD, “Biden wanted to restrict the 1031 tax exchange program, which allows investors to defer taxes by rolling their capital gains on recent property sales into new properties. Most recently, Biden pitched limiting the deferral of such gains to $500,000 for each taxpayer.” While we cannot predict if Harris would mimic Biden’s exact policies, it is safe to say she will err on the side of his policies as opposed to Trump’s.

Conversely, Trump’s agenda includes lowering mortgage rates by reducing inflation, though this is primarily controlled by the Federal Reserve, which sets target interest rates for the financial system. Additionally, Trump seeks to limit foreign investment in U.S. real estate, especially from China, and promote luxury developments.

An article by Bankrate indicates that housing prices rise in election years at a higher rate than non-election years. However, it’s nuanced. Even though election years may feel more volatile, Lisa Sturtevant, chief economist at Bright MLS, a large listing service, says, “Historically the housing market doesn’t tend to look very different in presidential election year compared to other years.” She goes on to say that it comes down to demographics and the economy.

In particular, unemployment and interest rates are more important than what is happening on the national political scene.

Given that average mortgage rates are more than double what they were in 2020 and 2021, and home prices remain sky-high, housing activity remains stagnant, with existing home sales at their lowest since 2020.

Conversely, purchases arising from a ‘fear of missing out’ can drive up prices and heighten expectations of strong house-price gains.

Whether the Democrats or the Republicans win, the outcome is likely to impact the real estate market because there’s going to be a backlash to whoever is in power.

Ultimately, the election outcome may influence real estate, with reactions varying depending on which party wins. While election years bring volatility, the turbulence is temporary. Renters, buyers, and sellers may wait for the election results before making significant moves, knowing that prices and rates could fluctuate during this period.

It’s always worth remembering that past performance should not be taken as a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may not get back what you put in. You should continue to hold cash for your short-term needs.

Let’s face it, a drop in mortgage rates — with the possibility of a continued reduction in the Fed’s interest rates — will be the driving force for many who are priced out by the current numbers. Is that going to be enough to create an uptick? It’s still to be seen, but the ability for people to seize an opportunity becomes much more palpable, and in the end, real estate may become one of the most effective vehicles for diversification in a volatile climate.

Issue 125 – The $5 Million Question: What’s Actually Worth Owning in New York Right Now?

The New York real estate market is entering a period where the old rules of valuation are becoming less reliable. Price per square foot and comparable sales still matter, but buyers are weighing those factors differently — rewarding some attributes while quietly discounting others. The question is no longer simply, “What did the apartment downstairs sell for?” It’s “What are buyers willing to pay a premium for now — and what have they stopped paying for?”

I could identify at least seven factors being repriced in Manhattan right now: outdoor space, views/greenery, turnkey condition, monthly carrying costs, new development versus resale, second-home ownership, and the increasingly important distinction between a great apartment and a great building.

Confusing matters for buyers is that the NYC market is sending contradictory signals. Manhattan inventory is changing by price band, mortgage rates remain challenging nationally, and NYC’s new pied-à-terre tax is creating another potential dividing line in how buyers assess ownership costs.  

In the luxury zone, one way to test those shifting valuations is what I call “The $5-Million-Question.”

I can take $5 million and show clients what that buys today in six completely different versions of New York: Think:

  • $5M on Central Park West
  • $5M downtown
  • $5M in Brooklyn
  • $5M in a new development
  • $5M in a great prewar co-op
  • $5M for something compromised but spectacular

Same amount of money. Same city. Radically different value.

The questions to ponder are:

  • Which one would I buy?
  • Which one would I avoid?
  • Which one has the greatest upside?
  • And which one will be easiest to sell five years from now?

That comparison is more revealing than a market-wide statistic because it shows what the same $5 million actually buys — and what it might be worth to the next buyer.

On the surface, the questions are simple. In practice, answering them requires a sophisticated analysis — price per square foot, carrying costs, taxes, liquidity, buyer pool, neighborhood trajectory, architectural quality, and exit strategy. Buyers should seek out an expert broker not only for information but also for interpretation.

For a long time, value was assessed through familiar metrics: price per square foot, comparable sales, neighborhood, floor, light, views, condition, and building pedigree. Those factors still matter. But buyers are now weighing them differently. We are in a repricing phase — not necessarily of New York City as a whole, but of the individual components that define its value.

At Central Park West, $5 million typically trades square footage for permanence: park frontage, architectural significance, scarcity, and long-term stability.

Downtown, the same budget may secure a more contemporary product — larger windows, amenities, and outdoor space — but often at a higher price per square foot and with higher ongoing costs.

In a new development, $5 million buys condition, services, and immediacy. The question is how much of that price reflects a “new development premium,” and whether the resale market will recognize it when the time comes to exit.

In Brooklyn, the same capital can deliver scale, outdoor space, and architectural character that would be significantly more expensive in Manhattan.

None of these is inherently superior. The real questions are: What are you actually buying, and who will want it next? That second part is often underweighted: Which market is offering more rewards?

Based on buyer behavior, several attributes are becoming more defensible:

Light and views are not replicable. While layouts can be changed, exposure and outlook cannot be transformed.

Functional outdoor space is valuable. Usable terraces connected to living areas are materially more valuable than secondary or awkwardly accessed outdoor areas.

Strong floor plans are key. The pandemic reinforced that usability matters as much as size. Proportion, flow, and flexibility are now critical.

Condition has always mattered — now more than ever. High construction costs and uncertainty have increased demand for finished product. However, there is a ceiling — buyers will not indefinitely overpay for someone else’s design choices.

Low carrying friction is persuasive. Taxes, common charges, assessments, and long-term building health are now central to valuation. High monthly costs can materially impact resale liquidity.

Scarcity can be the tipping point. A strong apartment does not need to be perfect. It needs to be difficult to replicate.

So, where would I be most cautious today?

I would be disciplined about paying a premium purely for newness. New does not hold value on its own — architecture, location, and scarcity do. I would closely evaluate buildings where carrying costs are disconnected from underlying asset value. I would avoid trophy pricing unless there is a true trophy attribute. And I would be careful about pricing that is anchored primarily to renovation cost.

A $2 million renovation does not translate into a $2 million increase in value.

The market does not reimburse cost. It prices outcome.

If I were allocating funds at this level, the guiding principles should be: light over finishes, proportion over decoration, irreplaceable views over amenity packages, and ultimately, best-in-class units in proven buildings over average units in trending ones.

The strongest purchases do two things at once: they function as exceptional homes today and remain desirable assets tomorrow. That means thinking about the exit before the entry — and recognizing that New York isn’t one market, but a collection of micro-markets defined by neighborhood, block, building, floor, and orientation.

While real estate is inherently emotional, value is what remains when emotion fades.

Whether the budget is $1 million, $5 million, or $25 million, the question is ultimately the same: What is actually worth owning?

That is the question the next phase of the market will answer — and it will reward analysis over generalization.

Recent Reports

SUBSCRIBE TO THE KATZEN REPORT

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE PULSE ON REAL ESTATE