Issue 109 – NYC Real Estate: Stability When Stocks Swing

While I do not claim to be an expert on the stock market, it doesn’t take one to notice the flux in that market during the last quarter. With legislation regarding tariffs flip-flopping daily, unemployment and inflation rising, and the threat of a full-blown recession on the horizon, it’s no surprise investors are feeling a bit out of sorts. Many are reticent to sink their money into anything potentially volatile right now, namely an asset that can drop on a dime.

Enter: the NYC real estate market. Tariffs push people to stay local; consequently, many will gravitate towards property purchases in a real estate mecca like NYC. We also see other signs of folks wanting to invest in local (tariff-free) assets. For example, vintage car sales have experienced an uptick. Investments in online companies and digital sales are also beyond the reach of tariffs.  

These opportunities become very interesting arenas in the context of a dysfunctional market.

As such, most risk-averse investors prefer putting their money into the local real estate market, which seems much more stable than the volatile stock market. This trend is compounded by the softening of the market due to sluggish sales, leading to more negotiability, as well as lower interest rates sparking more interest. These factors create an opportunistic asset that only gets better with time.  

I’m not alone in this thinking. Last month, Haven, a national magazine focused on luxury markets, noted the same phenomenon. The article points to many examples, such as “historical precedents—9/11, the Great Recession, and the COVID-19 pandemic—when temporary setbacks in real estate were followed by sharp rebounds.”

It then shares opinions by top real estate market experts showing that property in NYC tends to follow a steadier trajectory: “Even during winter months, when housing activity typically slows, rents have reached record highs, bolstered by limited supply and strategic lease structuring by landlords. This steady upward pressure on value has created favorable conditions for long-term investors.”

Indeed, real estate is a steady income-producing asset in NYC, where demand continues to outweigh supply. Other experts cited in Haven concur: “In Downtown Manhattan neighborhoods like Soho, Tribeca, and the West Village, low inventory levels are fueling bidding wars, especially for trophy properties. Scarcity is driving urgency.”

One facet of life never changes: Food and shelter are the primary needs. So if rates are coming down and your income isn’t going up, but rents are—buying property can be one of the most effective ways to grow your own money, particularly when the stock market is unstable or difficult to decipher.

The instability in the financial markets often directly impacts real estate purchases — some buyers use portfolio assets for down payments and to show liquidity for co-op boards. Overall, however, buyers are finding real estate a much steadier landscape to navigate right now, especially when guided and accompanied by a seasoned real estate expert to help them navigate the market.

I am personally witnessing people who might have invested heavily in stocks previously run into the safe haven of the NYC real estate market. I see many clients trying to gauge where they want to park their cash. Some are diversifying, some are unable to diversify, and some are absolutely making hay with the softening market to get some of the most amazing properties at compelling numbers.

According to Olshan Luxury Market Report, 45 contracts worth over $4 million were signed recently — 14 more than in the previous week. Twelve were over $10 million, representing the largest contract signing since December 13, 2021, during the run-up.

The recently released Elliman Report for Q1 also painted a rosy picture: In the co-op and condo sales markets, year-over-year sales are up nearly 29 percent. While inventory is still low, it has increased year-over-year by 7.5 percent, giving savvy buyers an opportunity to jump in. In fact, all important factors are on the rise compared with last year. Tellingly, nine out of 10 sales of properties over $3 million were all-cash deals.

On that note, the New York Post reported that the NYC luxury housing market saw its best quarter in six years! This finding was based on market reports compiled by CNBC from top brokerages, including Douglas Elliman, showing that 58 percent of all sales in the quarter were made in cash.

What is behind this upward trend? CNBC states, “increasingly strict back-to-office mandates on Wall Street and beyond are also bringing high earners back into the Manhattan fold.” CNBC’s report also credited the ongoing “great wealth transfer” of trillions of dollars from the baby boomer generation to their fortunate offspring.

The bottom line is that no one wants to ride a rollercoaster when it comes to their financial stability. Hunkering down now with a solid property purchase, particularly one that can offer a steady increase in economic benefits over time, will outweigh the potentially substantial loss on stocks if the volatile trajectory continues.

Issue 125 – The $5 Million Question: What’s Actually Worth Owning in New York Right Now?

The New York real estate market is entering a period where the old rules of valuation are becoming less reliable. Price per square foot and comparable sales still matter, but buyers are weighing those factors differently — rewarding some attributes while quietly discounting others. The question is no longer simply, “What did the apartment downstairs sell for?” It’s “What are buyers willing to pay a premium for now — and what have they stopped paying for?”

I could identify at least seven factors being repriced in Manhattan right now: outdoor space, views/greenery, turnkey condition, monthly carrying costs, new development versus resale, second-home ownership, and the increasingly important distinction between a great apartment and a great building.

Confusing matters for buyers is that the NYC market is sending contradictory signals. Manhattan inventory is changing by price band, mortgage rates remain challenging nationally, and NYC’s new pied-à-terre tax is creating another potential dividing line in how buyers assess ownership costs.  

In the luxury zone, one way to test those shifting valuations is what I call “The $5-Million-Question.”

I can take $5 million and show clients what that buys today in six completely different versions of New York: Think:

  • $5M on Central Park West
  • $5M downtown
  • $5M in Brooklyn
  • $5M in a new development
  • $5M in a great prewar co-op
  • $5M for something compromised but spectacular

Same amount of money. Same city. Radically different value.

The questions to ponder are:

  • Which one would I buy?
  • Which one would I avoid?
  • Which one has the greatest upside?
  • And which one will be easiest to sell five years from now?

That comparison is more revealing than a market-wide statistic because it shows what the same $5 million actually buys — and what it might be worth to the next buyer.

On the surface, the questions are simple. In practice, answering them requires a sophisticated analysis — price per square foot, carrying costs, taxes, liquidity, buyer pool, neighborhood trajectory, architectural quality, and exit strategy. Buyers should seek out an expert broker not only for information but also for interpretation.

For a long time, value was assessed through familiar metrics: price per square foot, comparable sales, neighborhood, floor, light, views, condition, and building pedigree. Those factors still matter. But buyers are now weighing them differently. We are in a repricing phase — not necessarily of New York City as a whole, but of the individual components that define its value.

At Central Park West, $5 million typically trades square footage for permanence: park frontage, architectural significance, scarcity, and long-term stability.

Downtown, the same budget may secure a more contemporary product — larger windows, amenities, and outdoor space — but often at a higher price per square foot and with higher ongoing costs.

In a new development, $5 million buys condition, services, and immediacy. The question is how much of that price reflects a “new development premium,” and whether the resale market will recognize it when the time comes to exit.

In Brooklyn, the same capital can deliver scale, outdoor space, and architectural character that would be significantly more expensive in Manhattan.

None of these is inherently superior. The real questions are: What are you actually buying, and who will want it next? That second part is often underweighted: Which market is offering more rewards?

Based on buyer behavior, several attributes are becoming more defensible:

Light and views are not replicable. While layouts can be changed, exposure and outlook cannot be transformed.

Functional outdoor space is valuable. Usable terraces connected to living areas are materially more valuable than secondary or awkwardly accessed outdoor areas.

Strong floor plans are key. The pandemic reinforced that usability matters as much as size. Proportion, flow, and flexibility are now critical.

Condition has always mattered — now more than ever. High construction costs and uncertainty have increased demand for finished product. However, there is a ceiling — buyers will not indefinitely overpay for someone else’s design choices.

Low carrying friction is persuasive. Taxes, common charges, assessments, and long-term building health are now central to valuation. High monthly costs can materially impact resale liquidity.

Scarcity can be the tipping point. A strong apartment does not need to be perfect. It needs to be difficult to replicate.

So, where would I be most cautious today?

I would be disciplined about paying a premium purely for newness. New does not hold value on its own — architecture, location, and scarcity do. I would closely evaluate buildings where carrying costs are disconnected from underlying asset value. I would avoid trophy pricing unless there is a true trophy attribute. And I would be careful about pricing that is anchored primarily to renovation cost.

A $2 million renovation does not translate into a $2 million increase in value.

The market does not reimburse cost. It prices outcome.

If I were allocating funds at this level, the guiding principles should be: light over finishes, proportion over decoration, irreplaceable views over amenity packages, and ultimately, best-in-class units in proven buildings over average units in trending ones.

The strongest purchases do two things at once: they function as exceptional homes today and remain desirable assets tomorrow. That means thinking about the exit before the entry — and recognizing that New York isn’t one market, but a collection of micro-markets defined by neighborhood, block, building, floor, and orientation.

While real estate is inherently emotional, value is what remains when emotion fades.

Whether the budget is $1 million, $5 million, or $25 million, the question is ultimately the same: What is actually worth owning?

That is the question the next phase of the market will answer — and it will reward analysis over generalization.

Recent Reports

SUBSCRIBE TO THE KATZEN REPORT

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE PULSE ON REAL ESTATE