Issue 111 – Closing Costs: What You Should Know

In New York City real estate, just when you think you’ve reached your limit, there’s always more. Enter: the infamous closing costs. These fees are substantial and in addition to the purchase price. Many buyers find them shocking and disheartening at the closing table. 

The term “closing costs” can encompass the friction costs associated with the resale of condos and co-ops, as well as new construction. Each one has a nuanced cost specific to that type of ownership, such as attorney, brokers and bank fees, capital contributions, the mortgage filing recording tax, transfer taxes, title insurance (condos and townhomes), the flip tax (for co-ops), the mansion tax (if the purchase is over $1 million), and a portion of the Resident Manager’s Unit [RMU] (if in new construction).

When buying or selling a property, the total sum of closing costs can be hefty, sometimes as high as 10 percent over the purchase price. A buyer will typically pay between 2 percent to as much as 6 percent on a resale, depending on whether it is a condo, townhouse or co-op; that amount can be substantially higher for new development purchases. Conversely, a seller who originally bought into new construction and had to pay transfer taxes with that purchase now has to pay them again when selling.   

Those purchasing in a new development should be aware that additional breadth of friction costs will be incurred, as the building has not yet been occupied. Those fees include contributing one to two months of common charges to the building’s reserve fund to comply with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan requirements, as well as purchasing a portion of the Resident Manager’s Unit [RMU] if the building has a resident manager or superintendent.  

All properties listed for over $1 million are subject to adjusted mansion taxes, which are based on a sliding scale determined by the sales price, in addition to transfer taxes typically paid by the sponsor (i.e., the developer).  

According to StreetEasy, a third-party listing site for New York City, “A good rule of thumb for buyers is to be prepared to spend 2-5% of the purchase price in closing costs, and expect the percentage to be on the higher end for condos, townhouses, homes over $1 million, and new developments.”

*Table provided by StreetEasy – Exact mansion tax rates are as follows:

Mansion Tax Rate

Purchase Price

1.0%

$1,000,000 – $1,999,999

1.25%

$2,000,000 – $2,999,999

1.50%

$3,000,000 – $4,999,999

2.25%

$5,000,000 – $9,999,999

3.25%

$10,000,000 – $14,999,999

3.50%

$15,000,000 – $19,999,999

3.75%

$20,000,000 – $24,999,999

3.90%

$25,000,000 or greater

 

For example, the mansion tax is 1.25% for properties listed between $2 million and $2.99 million, 1.50% for homes between $3 million and $4.99 million, and as much as 3.90% for a property with a sales price of $25 million.

This amount is compounded by the combined city and state transfer tax, which has also increased substantially, going from a flat rate of 1.825% (regardless of the sales price) to a sliding scale model, as outlined below:

  • 1.4% for sales below $500,000
  • 1.825% for sales between $500,000 and $3 million
  • 2.075% for sales of $3 million or more 

Therefore, a buyer purchasing a property for over $3 million could end up paying nearly 7% of the price just for the mansion tax and transfer tax.

Consider this only-in-NYC scenario: In 2019, billionaire Kenneth C. Griffen bought a penthouse at 220 Central Park South for a record-breaking $238 million, making it the most expensive residential sale in U.S. history at the time. Although the exact closing costs are not publicly available, estimates indicate the mansion tax alone would have been around $9.282 million! He would have also had to pay the transfer tax at the 2.075% rate, equaling over $4 million!  

The only upside to some closing costs is that they offer the ability to negotiate, depending on the market conditions. When buying in a new construction, for example, the sponsor typically expects the buyer to absorb these costs. However, in a down market, the buyer can potentially pass the mansion and transfer tax costs back to the sponsor, who may be willing to absorb the fees as a concession, thereby adding to the net savings for the buyer. 

In some cases, a buyer could even try to incorporate closing costs into the mortgage. Whether or not this happens, ultimately depends on how creative your mortgage broker is in structuring the loan. Certain banks are also able to make exceptions versus maintaining ‘vanilla’ loans that offer no flexibility.

According to an article by Evelyn Battaglia in BrickUnderground, “The responsibility for some of these taxes is not set in stone. When the market is slow, inventory is high, or an apartment is difficult to sell, a seller or developer may be willing to cover some costs to seal a deal.”

Assembling a team of well-versed and experienced professionals can make a substantial difference in the amount you have to spend. The key is identifying what to ask for and when, which can save you as much as 5% to 10% over the negotiation of the sales price, creating a quite compelling deal. 

It’s essential to work with people who know how to effectively close these kinds of deals. You should also price shop, comparing quotes from all the professionals you work with, notably real estate attorneys and mortgage brokers (or lenders), to understand the specific costs associated with each transaction and explore strategies for reducing them, as all those friction costs certainly add up.

The person who understands the structure in critical detail and knows how to negotiate it ultimately yields the most success. It is an art form to know how to structure deals effortlessly and garner the most profound value in real-time for their clients.

By exploring strategies for reducing all these costs—and most importantly, examining the total value proposition—you can have a stress-free closing, knowing that you were ultimately able to lock in savings before you even move in!

Issue 122 – Foreign Demand Re-Emerges as Luxury Buyers Underwrite Political Risk

As we head into summer, we are seeing a very notable resurgence of international buyers entering the New York market — and frankly, in a way we haven’t seen in years.

Let’s explore why.

Historically, global capital gravitates toward stability, discretion, and internationally recognized assets. In New York City, that typically translates to park-facing residences, trophy properties, and globally recognizable “name-brand” buildings. These include Aman, Four Seasons, Related developments, and legacy Park Avenue or Central Park South product with strong service infrastructure and long-term value preservation.

Right now, buyers are looking for quality, security, and assets that feel insulated in uncertain times. NYC, despite all the headlines, remains a strong, long-term store of value internationally.

When there is instability abroad, New York City benefits. It offers legal transparency, deep liquidity, world-class education, finance, culture, and healthcare — and a real estate market that, while imperfect, is still well understood around the world.

What’s different now is that buyers are not necessarily purchasing because they think New York is “hot.” They are buying because New York is established. That is an important distinction: the capital is less speculative and more preservation-oriented. For many international families, a New York apartment is part lifestyle asset, part hedge, part legacy planning.

The headlines about wealthy buyers fleeing New York City are often too simplistic. Yes, some buyers have moved capital to Florida, Texas, or other lower-tax markets. But that does not mean New York has lost its global relevance.

The newly announced pied-a-terre/second-home tax in New York targets luxury second homes valued at $5 million or more, with the goal of creating an annual surcharge on non-primary residences. This proposal is certainly something international buyers are paying attention to, though it remains to be seen if this will impact continued investment. Rather than eliminating foreign demand, the tax likely makes buyers more selective, becoming part of the broader cost-of-ownership analysis alongside the mansion tax, carrying costs, and currency exposure. It may create pause around marginal purchases, but for a trophy asset, it won’t stop the buyer. It simply raises the bar for what feels worth owning.

The concern is less the dollar amount itself and more the perception. International buyers are highly sensitive to whether a market feels welcoming, predictable, and stable. Policy often moves perception before it moves fundamentals.

We’re consistently seeing foreign buyers generally gravitate toward turnkey product. The appetite for renovation or operational complexity is far lower than it once was. Buyers want ease, service, security, and a property that immediately translates internationally, both from a branding and lifestyle standpoint. For these global buyers, New York remains one of the few carrying both emotional and financial prestige.

Enter: Japanese buyers. The Real Deal recently reported a massive resurgence in Japanese capital, providing a lifeline to aging multifamily walk-ups. “Japan-linked firms have acquired at least $2.1 billion worth of New York City property since the start of 2024, according to analysis by Okada & Company and TRD Data,” the piece details.

This surge is driven by a stark yield gap: With low interest rates at home, Japanese buyers can borrow cheaply in Japan to acquire higher-yielding assets, a strategy supercharged by domestic tax incentives for multi-family purchases.

We are also seeing diversifying residential demand from Australian, Brazilian, Taiwanese, and Western Europe buyers. Eastern European activity is still highly selective compared to prior cycles, but international demand as a whole has undeniably re-entered the market. The usual suspects — such as Central Park South, Tribeca, Billionaire’s Row, and select Downtown properties — remain the primary anchors.

Target price points for these foreign investors vary by country of origin and the purchase’s purpose, with the most active international demand falling into clear segments:.

The serious lifestyle buyer ($3M to $7M): Typically targets a strong two or three bedrooms in a premier building, prioritizing service, security, and an easy lock-and-leave lifestyle.

The wealth-preservation buyer ($7M to $15M+): Focuses heavily on blue-chip locations — Central Park, Fifth Avenue, Park Avenue, Tribeca, Billionaires’ Row — or globally recognized branded residences.

The ultra-high-net-worth buyer: Prioritizes the asset above any price point, focusing on scarcity, pedigree, privacy, views, service, and long-term relevance. They are not asking, “Is this affordable?” They are asking, “Will this matter 10 years from now?”

Today’s foreign buyer is much more disciplined. They want turnkey and certainty. They want building quality, service quality, financial stability, and a residence that translates globally.

The biggest shift is that foreign buyers are not chasing the market — they are underwriting it. They are asking better questions: What are the monthly carrying costs? Who is the resale audience? How strong is the building financially? How liquid is this asset? Does this location hold value in multiple cycles?

Overall, cultural nuance matters more than ever. Buyers are underwriting not just the apartment, but NYC itself.

Five years ago, there was still more appetite for optionality — buyers were more willing to consider renovation, new development premiums, or speculative upside.

On the Japanese side specifically, what I’m noticing is a renewed comfort level with NYC real estate as a legacy asset class. The buyers I’m seeing tend to be highly analytical, long-term focused, and extremely quality-driven. They’re not chasing hype — they’re buying permanence.

The Brazilian and Australian buyers we’re seeing tend to be incredibly lifestyle-oriented while still highly aware of long-term value, whereas many Western European buyers continue to prioritize pedigree buildings, architecture, privacy, and stability. Taiwanese buyers similarly appear very focused on security, quality, and established global positioning.

For foreign investors, New York City still represents something very specific: legal stability, cultural prestige, liquidity, access, education, healthcare, and global identity. The buyers I’m seeing are not ignoring the headlines. They are simply looking past them when the asset is strong enough.

New York is no longer a market where everything trades easily. It is a precision market. But for the right property — the right building, the right view, the right service, the right location — foreign buyers are still very much there.

The common denominator across almost all of them is that they are buying selectively — but decisively — when the product feels globally relevant.

Recent Reports

SUBSCRIBE TO THE KATZEN REPORT

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE PULSE ON REAL ESTATE